[Nepal] Ranjana draft: JIHVAMULIYA & UPADHMANIYA CHARACTERS

Sanir Karmacharya saneer at hotmail.co.uk
Fri Apr 10 12:50:03 BST 2009










According to my understanding, variant forms of each character from a single source don't need to be included. It should be done by the font developers. Am I right, Michael?
Samir Karmacharya

> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:39:07 +0600
> From: cfynn at gmx.net
> To: nepal at evertype.com
> Subject: [Nepal] Ranjana draft: JIHVAMULIYA &  UPADHMANIYA CHARACTERS
> 
> These two need to be included.
> 
> The attached png example shows three variant forms of each character 
> from a single source, which brings up the question ~ do we need to 
> include  variant selector sequences in the proposal?
> 
> Also in the case of these two characters how do we handle them when they
> occur in the middle of a vertical conjunct? (A Sanskrit manuscript of 
> the Kālacakra Tantra or the Vimalaprabha would be sure to have such 
> conjuncts)
> 
> Chris

Windows Live Messenger just got better. Find out more!
_________________________________________________________________
View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn more!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://evertype.com/pipermail/nepal_evertype.com/attachments/20090410/764a57f3/attachment.htm>


More information about the Nepal mailing list