From ishida at w3.org Sat Mar 2 13:02:52 2019 From: ishida at w3.org (r12a) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:02:52 +0000 Subject: [Egyptian] Egyptian picker now supports Unicode 12 formatting characters Message-ID: I don't know whether anyone uses it, but the picker at https://r12a.github.io/pickers/egyptian/ has been updated to allow insertion of the new Unicode12 formatting codes. I haven't announced it widely yet for 2 reasons: [1] I have begun to upgrade the MDC<>Unicode<>MDC converters, but i need to do a little more work there. [2] I don't have a font that supports the formatting behaviour. Does anyone know of a font which i can recommend for download, or better still, include as a webfont? ri From odusseus at gmail.com Sat Mar 2 14:02:12 2019 From: odusseus at gmail.com (Marwan Kilani) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 15:02:12 +0100 Subject: [Egyptian] Egyptian picker now supports Unicode 12 formatting characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Nice! A far as I know, there is no font available that supports the formatting behavior, also because every single group would need to be encoded singularly, as a ligature combining hieroglyphs + control characters. This, besides being a huge job, lead to a problem that, again as far as I know, does not seem to have any easy solution for now: many common text editors (certainly word on mac os x) cannot compose ligatures formed by more than 4 elements. Which means that they cannot process any group formed by more than 2 hieroglyphs + 2 control characters, or 3 hieros and 1 control characters... best Marwan On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 2:02 PM r12a wrote: > I don't know whether anyone uses it, but the picker at > https://r12a.github.io/pickers/egyptian/ > has been updated to allow insertion of the new Unicode12 formatting codes. > > I haven't announced it widely yet for 2 reasons: > > [1] I have begun to upgrade the MDC<>Unicode<>MDC converters, but i need > to do a little more work there. > > [2] I don't have a font that supports the formatting behaviour. > > Does anyone know of a font which i can recommend for download, or better > still, include as a webfont? > > ri > > _______________________________________________ > Egyptian mailing list > Egyptian at evertype.com > http://evertype.com/mailman/listinfo/egyptian_evertype.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ishida at w3.org Fri Mar 22 11:59:27 2019 From: ishida at w3.org (r12a) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:59:27 +0000 Subject: [Egyptian] Request for review: RTL rendering of Egyptian in HTML Message-ID: folks, I think you may find it useful to read this article, which is still a pre-published draft. It describes a simple way to make text such as Egyptian hieroglyphs run RTL in HTML, and even mirror glyphs, without disturbing the normal semantic flow of the character stream. http://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-ltr-scripts-in-rtl.en I'd also appreciate it if you could check whether the characters i used for the Egyptian example are correct: ?????? ? U+13153 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH G017 ? U+130A4 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH D043 ? U+133A1 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH V031 ? U+133CF EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH X001 ? U+133E6 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH Z002A ? U+1302D EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A040 many thanks, Richard. PS: I haven't given any thought to how this affects or is affected by the use of quadrats created by the new Unicode formatting characters. From rosmord at iut.univ-paris8.fr Fri Mar 22 12:45:18 2019 From: rosmord at iut.univ-paris8.fr (Serge Rosmorduc) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:45:18 +0100 Subject: [Egyptian] Request for review: RTL rendering of Egyptian in HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8A46D0B6-C27A-4220-946D-486B98183231@iut.univ-paris8.fr> Hello, The glyphs should be > > ? U+13153 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH G017 > ? U+1309E EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH D037 <<< NOT the same sign > ? U+133A1 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH V031 > ? U+133CF EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH X001 > ? U+133E6 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH Z002A > ? U+1302D EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A040 > regarding RTL hieroglyphs, the use cases in publications would be : a) mixed with RTL characters in RTL modern writing systems (Arabic, Hebrew) b) in diplomatic edition. In this case, the text is likely to be rather long, and might be mixed with modern script (line/position indications, short latin text indicating lacuna size, ecdotic information?) Best regards, Serge Rosmorduc From ishida at w3.org Fri Mar 22 13:15:55 2019 From: ishida at w3.org (r12a) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:15:55 +0000 Subject: [Egyptian] Request for review: RTL rendering of Egyptian in HTML In-Reply-To: <8A46D0B6-C27A-4220-946D-486B98183231@iut.univ-paris8.fr> References: <8A46D0B6-C27A-4220-946D-486B98183231@iut.univ-paris8.fr> Message-ID: hi Serge, Many thanks! I substituted the correct character. http://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-ltr-scripts-in-rtl.en The mixture with other RTL writing systems should be fine, since bdo isolates the text directionally. Afaik, the other use case should be ok too. ri On 22/03/2019 12:45, Serge Rosmorduc wrote: > Hello, > > The glyphs should be > > >> >> ? U+13153 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH G017 >> ? U+1309E EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH D037 <<< NOT the same sign >> ? U+133A1 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH V031 >> ? U+133CF EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH X001 >> ? U+133E6 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH Z002A >> ? U+1302D EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A040 >> > > > regarding RTL hieroglyphs, the use cases in publications would be : > > a) mixed with RTL characters in RTL modern writing systems (Arabic, Hebrew) > b) in diplomatic edition. In this case, the text is likely to be rather long, and might be mixed with > modern script (line/position indications, short latin text indicating lacuna size, > ecdotic information?) > > > Best regards, > > Serge Rosmorduc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Egyptian mailing list > Egyptian at evertype.com > http://evertype.com/mailman/listinfo/egyptian_evertype.com > From s.polis at ulg.ac.be Fri Mar 22 16:28:58 2019 From: s.polis at ulg.ac.be (=?utf-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_polis?=) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:28:58 +0000 Subject: [Egyptian] Request for review: RTL rendering of Egyptian in HTML In-Reply-To: References: <8A46D0B6-C27A-4220-946D-486B98183231@iut.univ-paris8.fr> Message-ID: <43A1CB8D-209D-415A-9D24-9DD2C13A0CB7@ulg.ac.be> Hi, Note that the ? should be above, and not below the ?. All best, St?phane > Le 22 mars 2019 ? 13:15, r12a a ?crit : > > hi Serge, > > Many thanks! I substituted the correct character. > http://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-ltr-scripts-in-rtl.en > > > The mixture with other RTL writing systems should be fine, since bdo isolates the text directionally. Afaik, the other use case should be ok too. > > ri > > > On 22/03/2019 12:45, Serge Rosmorduc wrote: >> Hello, >> The glyphs should be >>> >>> ? U+13153 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH G017 >>> ? U+1309E EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH D037 <<< NOT the same sign >>> ? U+133A1 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH V031 >>> ? U+133CF EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH X001 >>> ? U+133E6 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH Z002A >>> ? U+1302D EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH A040 >>> >> regarding RTL hieroglyphs, the use cases in publications would be : >> a) mixed with RTL characters in RTL modern writing systems (Arabic, Hebrew) >> b) in diplomatic edition. In this case, the text is likely to be rather long, and might be mixed with >> modern script (line/position indications, short latin text indicating lacuna size, >> ecdotic information?) >> Best regards, >> Serge Rosmorduc >> _______________________________________________ >> Egyptian mailing list >> Egyptian at evertype.com >> http://evertype.com/mailman/listinfo/egyptian_evertype.com > > _______________________________________________ > Egyptian mailing list > Egyptian at evertype.com > http://evertype.com/mailman/listinfo/egyptian_evertype.com