[Egyptian] UMdC - A Unicode Coding Manual for Egyptian?
Daniel Werning
daniel.werning at topoi.org
Tue Jul 25 11:55:13 BST 2017
Dear Bob,
I am generally interested in joining the discussion.
I have exercised some encoding in TEI XML based on the current state of
Unicode encoding.
See: http://rosettastone.hieroglyphic-texts.net/tei-xml/.
The encoding of the arrangement will be easier with the six control
characters in pipeline for Unicode. However, there are cases left of
non-unicode signs and non-simple arrangements, which can -- nicely, I
believe -- be encoded in TEI XML. Anyhow, I can imagine that I can
contribute based on my experience.
All the best,
Daniel (Werning)
--
_____________________________________________________________
Dr. Daniel A. Werning
daniel.werning at topoi.org
http://www.topoi.org/person/werning-daniel-a/
Exzellenzcluster Topoi
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
_____________________________________________________________
Am 25.07.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Bob Richmond:
> Hi All
>
> 1071 Hieroglyphs have been available in Unicode since version 5.2
> (2009). Six formatting characters are now in the pipeline (since May).
> Eventually there will be more hieroglyphs and likely control characters too.
>
> The idea of defining a data file format “UMdC” acknowledging Unicode was
> discussed at I&E 2006 and afterwards but the lack of Unicode
> availability in the standard and issues of application and system
> support made this seem a little premature. It seems to me the time is
> now ripe to revisit the topic.
>
> The basics of UMdC (as I see it) are as follows:
>
> 1. A well defined file type “umdc” containing plain text and markup
> (capable of being edited in simple text editors such as Windows
> Notepad and HTML textarea blocks).
> 2. Guidance on subset usage in database records.
> 3. Basic plain text including the 1071 + 6 for Egyptian characters
> (plus e.g. transliteration formats).
> 4. Markup to deal with elements missing from Unicode such as
> hieroglyphs not in the 1071 set.
> 5. Optional markup to help with preparing data for use with other
> formats such as HTML/CSS and Office applications.
> 6. Optional markup to help with interoperability with MdC88 based data
> formats (including extensions such as JSesh).
> 7. Specification of font requirements needed for representation of UMdC
> data.
>
> So long as the markup system is sufficiently flexible (e.g. use of
> XML-like tags) version 1 of UMdC need not be overly featured and then
> additions can be made as need is proven. It should be possible to create
> a version 1 specification supported with basic tools in months not years.
>
> I expect I’m not the only person who has already done related work. Has
> anyone any points to make of what they would like to see in UMdC? Anyone
> like to get involved in defining the markup scheme?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob Richmond
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Egyptian mailing list
> Egyptian at evertype.com
> http://evertype.com/mailman/listinfo/egyptian_evertype.com
>
More information about the Egyptian
mailing list