[EversonMono] Is something wrong with Everson Mono's oblique?

David Perry hospes.primus at verizon.net
Wed Nov 24 22:43:20 GMT 2010

Historically, italic was a style of type created during the Renaissance, 
based on the best handwriting of the Italian humanists (hence the name 
"italics").  If you take a calligraphy pen and hold it as right-handed 
people usually do, with the nib slanted at 40 degrees or so, and write 
nicely, you'll get something like italic.  It was originally a 
standalone style; entire books were set in it.  Later on, as Adam said, 
the custom became established of using italic as a companion face to 
roman type.

If you carefully compare an oblique (an "italic" version of a sans-serif 
font such as Arial) to a true italic, you will see the differences 
between the two.  Italic is a companion to serifed roman faces; oblique 
is a companion to sans-serif faces, being simply a slanted version 
without the calligraphic touches that characterize italic.  It is true 
that italics developed from the handwriting of the humanists, but it is 
a traditional style on its own and not to be confused with the 
"handwriting" fonts such as Comic Sans.

The fact that you apply "italics" to a serif or sans-serif font in your 
word processor by pressing control-I or something obscures the 
difference for many people.

On 11/24/2010 4:09 PM, H. Chris Gast wrote:
>> Oblique vs Italic
> Hello,
> I would just ask a maybe silly question: Why is there any difference
> between italic and oblique?
> In italic the letter a differs from the normal a. But why does this
> difference in our times still exists?
> When I want a "a" like in handwriting, I would use a font with handwriting?
> In Wikipedia I didn't find the reason.
> Yours
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> EversonMono mailing list
> EversonMono at evertype.com
> http://evertype.com/mailman/listinfo/eversonmono_evertype.com

More information about the EversonMono mailing list