[EversonMono] It's a nice font, but...

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Sun Aug 17 15:38:37 IST 2008

On 13 Aug 2008, at 06:33, Benjamin M Scarborough wrote:

> I have to admit, I really like the new version of Everson Mono. It's  
> a nice, aesthetically pleasing font that fills in the more  
> disappointing gaps in my computer's support of Unicode.


> My sole complaint is that it doesn't support the Ancient Symbols  
> block (U+10190..U+101CF). It's curious, though, as the block  
> currently contains only distinctly Roman characters, and Everson  
> Mono otherwise appears to have complete (non-mathematical) coverage  
> of the Latin script.

I have just released Everson Mono 5.1.2 which contains this block. See http://www.evertype.com/emono/

> Of course, when something small like that is my sole complaint, it  
> must mean that the font is pretty good. I even noticed that it had a  
> few characters like U+0524 supported before being published in a new  
> version of Unicode.

Yes, there are a few characters like that. I waffle back and forth  
about whether to include on-ballot or nearly-on-ballot characters. In  
this version I did so. What do people think about it?

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://evertype.com/pipermail/eversonmono_evertype.com/attachments/20080817/208f0dcb/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the EversonMono mailing list