[EversonMono] Everson Mono updated
everson at evertype.com
Thu Aug 7 08:28:24 IST 2008
On 7 Aug 2008, at 03:41, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> I'm not saying that you should use it on Linux. The software is also
> available for MS Windows and Mac OS.
Obviously I would not use it under Windows. And in the Mac OS it is
not available except under the X11 Linux interface.
>> The restriction is, indeed, stupid, but I understand that this may
>> change in a future release.
> Keeping fingers crossed gets you nowhere you know.
Adam has suggested that this on the ATypi discussion list I believe.
> That restriction is intentional it seems (what we call "Defective By
> Design"), and I guess it's for pushing people to buy their next
> level software (I can't remember the name of FontLab products, but
> if I recall correctly, the
> East Asian version does not have that restriction).
Asia Font Studio does not have that restriction, and is very
expensive, and is really like a version of FontLab 4 rather than
FontLab 5. I'm not tempted t buy it because I don't do Asian fonts and
because FontLab 5 is better than FontLab 4.
> I don't think you really need a software conforming to Apple Human
> Interface Guidelines (I don't know if FontLab does that either) for
> just packaging your font.
You're a Linux programmer. Of course you might not feel that an
acceptable GUI is necessary.
> You need a software that has less bugs (FontForge),
> conforms better to the OpenType etc specifications (FontForge),
> and has a better user interface for OpenType etc tables (FontForge).
Citation? You've used FontLab's tables?
I'm sure FontForge is admirable and that I know that you have used it
for Arabic. (I do wish there were recipes out there for creating
Arabic fonts... particularly as someone wants monowidth Arabic support
>> I don't really have any problem paying for software either.
> Yes, but you are not super-rich either. Being gratis helps one try
> the software without worrying about the price.
I tried it.
>> That's nice. Where's the OS X version?
> Here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=103338&package_id=111040
Oh, how I hate Linux and the whole "Programmers can do it themselves!"
ethos. That page, of course, is not user-friendly in terms of
identifying which package I should download. It turns out that it was
... but the lack of guidance is a splendid example of the programmist
élitism that Linux users have. It's wonderful that many people can
compile a binary, or even know what that means. Those of us -- even
smart guys like me -- who are not programmers really don't relate to
> There also seems to be some installation instructions here:
I installed it. Actually I installed the Tiger one first and then re-
installed the Leopard one over it. In any case, I opened it in X11 and
it looked like an OS 9 app. I did some clicking here and there, and
ended up with a nice screen freeze.
You get what you pay for. Free software is great....
I tried to export my font. It failed for one reason or another.
Perhaps the screen freeze? It started giving me advice about glyph
errors and then froze. Should I be inclined to invest a lot of time in
>> I certainly intend to continue to use Fontographer to draw my glyphs.
> That seems to be a good idea.
Oh my, yes! I love Fontographer.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the EversonMono